ICO’s McDougall: ‘We’re losing a battle for trust,’ but there’s a solution

This post was originally published on this site

His opening statement was unequivocal: “We are losing a battle for trust.” That is, people are losing trust in modern business and innovation. 

The reason? “Every time we create something cool, we are not bringing people with us. This trust deficit widens and widens.”

In his keynote address here at the IAPP Data Protection Intensive in London, U.K. Information Commissioner’s Office Executive Director for Technology Policy and Innovation Simon McDougall, CIPP/E, CIPM, CIPT, presented a clear warning to players in the current digital ecosystem.

On the one hand, “we’re living in a really exciting world with innovation that brings huge changes to how we live and work,” he said. Personalized medicine is extending lives. Smart cities are curbing air pollution and organizing traffic flows. 5G telecommunications networks are about to “radically change our interaction with our phones and devices.” 

But at the ICO, he warned, “we’re seeing issues around this trust deficit.” For example, the agency’s annual track survey found only 15 percent of those surveyed have a high-level trust in social media. “Only 10 years ago,” McDougall said, “tech firms could do no wrong.” The wow-factor era for the latest smartphone or online search capability has gone the way of the dodo. 

For McDougall, people are now living in an “age of unhappiness” and are not feeling empowered. With large tech companies, the balance of power has shifted, and “people are feeling unhappy about that.” But at the same time, he observes, “people are still using their devices because they don’t feel like they have a choice,” and “acquiescence does not equal trust.”

To illustrate, he pointed out that the “agree button is one of the biggest lies on the internet. This is not consent. This is not notice.”   

Ultimately, what this means is that the digital economy is heading toward a crisis point. “There’s an express train heading toward the privacy community. If we don’t react, we will reap the consequences.” 

But all was not doom and gloom for McDougall, who believes this is also a time for opportunity. In his new role at the ICO, he gets to offer stakeholders the “carrot” while being on the front lines of innovation. And this means working with innovative companies, thought leaders, privacy pros and other organizations. 

Citing a recent ad tech event hosted by the ICO, McDougall said the agency aims to work with the industry and innovators. Though, he said, “We’re not happy with what we’re seeing in ad tech,” a debate and conversation are going here. 

To help work with industry on several fronts, McDougall said the ICO is also focusing on artificial intelligence by working with the Alan Turing Institute to help develop and enhance its expertise in the growing AI field. This would include learning how to make the technology’s decision-making capabilities more explainable to people. To help, the ICO has set up an AI regulators’ group “with as many regulators as possible,” and hired AI expert Reuben Binns to build out an AI audit framework. This would include finding out how an AI is developed, built and tested and how training data is used, as well as how to address black-box algorithms. 

Similarly, the ICO has launched a grants program to help promote and support innovative research and solutions for privacy problems. It has also built a “regulatory sandbox” — a safe space of sorts in which startups and innovators can work with the ICO to figure out ways to create innovative services and products that use personal data while simultaneously protecting it. Continuing, the ICO has named the first two members to its new ICO Technology Advisory Panel: Luciano Floridi and Emiliano de Cristofaro, long-time experts in the data ethics field. 

Significantly, the ICO is working on new and updated guidance on anonymization. Its last guidance came out about 2013, McDougall said, so it’s due for an update. Cookie guidance may also be on the docket, and blockchain was in the queue … that is, until French data protection authority, the CNIL, came out with its own guidance in 2018. The CNIL’s guidance was good enough, he said, that the ICO decided it didn’t need to put out its own. But, he added, the ICO is working to engage further with the blockchain community. 

The amount of work the ICO is doing with technology and the front line of innovation gives McDougall hope. 

“My key message,” he said, “is that the ICO is nothing without the help of the people in this room. As privacy pros, you are on the front lines at your organizations. You make decisions about compliance and ethics. These are the real decisions, and you are snuffing out the issues along the way. We at the ICO want to ensure you that we support you.” 

The “innovation discussion is critical,” McDougall said, so that privacy pros and regulators are not the people who are always saying “no.” 

“This is personal for me,” he said, pointing out his years as a privacy pro working to advise chief privacy officers. “We want to make sure the ICO is helping privacy pros do the right thing like the IAPP helps privacy pros do the right thing.” 

And it’s by doing the right thing and working together that will help people regain the trust that has been lost in recent years. “That makes me optimistic,” he said. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

March 14, 2019