• Skip to main content

ITSecurity.org

Technology Security Controls

  • Main
  • Products
  • Services
    • Compliance-Services
      • ISO27001 Compliance
      • ISO22301 Compliance
      • ISO27002 Compliance
      • Data-Protection
      • GDPR
      • PCI-DSS Services
    • Identity and Access Management Services
      • IAM Design
      • IAM Policies & Standards
    • Incident Management Services
      • Emergency Incident Response
      • Forensic Support
      • Incident Response
    • Information Security Services
      • Information Security Consultancies
      • Information Security Governance Services
      • Information Security Policies & Standards
    • IT Risk Management Services
      • Risk Management Framework
      • Auditing
    • IT Security Consulting Services
      • IT Security Governance Services
      • IT Security Policies and Standards
    • Additional Security Services
      • Managed Security Services
      • Mobile Security
      • Network Security Services
    • Physical Security Services
      • Physical Security Reviews
    • Policies and Standards Services
    • Programme and Project Services
    • Risk Management Services
      • Risk Management – Framework
      • Risk Management Acceptance & Waivers
    • Security Awareness Services
      • Security Awareness – Phishing Responses
      • Phishing Responses
      • Security Awareness Training – Rebranded Security Training
      • Security Awareness Training – Generic
    • Security Design Services
      • All Security Design and Architectural Services
      • Cloud Security Review
      • Security Appliance Design and Configuration
    • Security Metrics Services
    • Technical Security Assessment Services
      • Penetration Testing – Our Penetration Test Services
      • Database Security – Databases and Repositories
      • Application Security Code Testing
      • Application Security Services
    • Third-Party and Supplier Assurance Services
      • Third and Supplier Party Assurance Methodology
      • Third and Supplier Party Assurance Review
      • Joint Venture Due Diligence
  • Security Digest
  • FAQ
  • Contact Us

More on the SolarWinds Breach

December 17, 2020 by ITSecurity.Org Ltd

The New York Times has more details.

About 18,000 private and government users downloaded a Russian tainted software update –­ a Trojan horse of sorts ­– that gave its hackers a foothold into victims’ systems, according to SolarWinds, the company whose software was compromised.

Among those who use SolarWinds software are the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the State Department, the Justice Department, parts of the Pentagon and a number of utility companies. While the presence of the software is not by itself evidence that each network was compromised and information was stolen, investigators spent Monday trying to understand the extent of the damage in what could be a significant loss of American data to a foreign attacker.

It’s unlikely that the SVR (a successor to the KGB) penetrated all of those networks. But it is likely that they penetrated many of the important ones. And that they have buried themselves into those networks, giving them persistent access even if this vulnerability is patched. This is a massive intelligence coup for the Russians and failure for the Americans, even if no classified networks were touched.

Meanwhile, CISA has directed everyone to remove SolarWinds from their networks. This is (1) too late to matter, and (2) likely to take many months to complete. Probably the right answer, though.

This is almost too stupid to believe:

In one previously unreported issue, multiple criminals have offered to sell access to SolarWinds’ computers through underground forums, according to two researchers who separately had access to those forums.

One of those offering claimed access over the Exploit forum in 2017 was known as “fxmsp” and is wanted by the FBI “for involvement in several high-profile incidents,” said Mark Arena, chief executive of cybercrime intelligence firm Intel471. Arena informed his company’s clients, which include U.S. law enforcement agencies.

Security researcher Vinoth Kumar told Reuters that, last year, he alerted the company that anyone could access SolarWinds’ update server by using the password “solarwinds123”

“This could have been done by any attacker, easily,” Kumar said.

Neither the password nor the stolen access is considered the most likely source of the current intrusion, researchers said.

That last sentence is important, yes. But the sloppy security practice is likely not an isolated incident, and speaks to the overall lack of security culture at the company.

And I noticed that SolarWinds has removed its customer page, presumably as part of its damage control efforts. I quoted from it. Did anyone save a copy?

EDITED TO ADD: Both the Wayback Machine and Brian Krebs have saved the SolarWinds customer page.

Filed Under: breaches, cyberespionage, cybersecurity, IT Security, national security policy, Russia, Uncategorized

Contact Us

If there's any way we can help, please let us know
Call: +44 01606 642307